Compare alternatives

repod vs gh-iga

gh-iga is a strong local scanner when you want a fast, read-only access report from a command line. repod is for teams that need the scan to become an operated review and cleanup workflow.

Where gh-iga shines

A low-friction local access scan

gh-iga positions itself as an open-source GitHub identity governance scanner that can produce a complete access picture from one command. Its public docs emphasize local output, configurable thresholds, CI scheduling, and read-only API calls.

Where repod fits

Reviewable GitHub access operations

repod fits when the next step matters: turning direct grants into team ownership, reviewing private repos with unclear coverage, delegating access work without org admin, and applying changes with a clear workflow.

Comparison

How to choose between repod and gh-iga

Pick based on whether you need a scan artifact or an ongoing access operating loop.

Decision point gh-iga repod
Primary job Run a local GitHub access scanner and produce reports. Inspect, review, delegate, and clean up GitHub repo-team access.
Operating model CLI-first; good for one-off scans and scheduled CI artifacts. Web workflow; good for repeated access reviews and non-admin collaboration.
Outputs Terminal summary plus HTML, Markdown, and JSON files. Visual org map, audit findings, export/review/apply workflows, and account-scoped history.
Best buyer Security-minded developer or platform engineer comfortable with local tooling. Engineering leaders, platform teams, and fractional CTOs who need a repeatable review process.
Access cleanup Flags risk and candidates for review. Helps turn findings into team-based changes and delegated access operations.

Source-grounded notes

What this comparison is based on

  • gh-iga describes itself as a scanner that answers who has access to what and writes local reports.
  • Its rules cover admin sprawl, inactive privileged users, outside collaborators, direct access candidates, and non-human identity findings.
  • The project documents HTML, Markdown, and JSON outputs, plus scheduled GitHub Actions usage.

Next step

Use repod when the audit needs an owner

Start with a free scan, then decide which direct grants, private repos, and high-privilege teams need review.

Run Free GitHub Access Audit